ConservativeINC

September 3, 2008

Newsweek Heaped Praise on Palin… In 2007

Filed under: Culture, Elections — admin @ 2:39 pm

Here’s how the piece starts out.

 

In 1998, voters in a focus group were asked to close their eyes and imagine what a governor should look like. “They automatically pictured a man,” says Barbara Lee, whose foundation promoting women’s political advancement sponsored the survey. “The kind you see in those portraits hanging in statehouse hallways.” They most certainly didn’t visualize Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, a former beauty-pageant winner, avid hunter, snowmobiler and mother of four who was elected to her state’s highest office last November.

Sounds like they are liking her here. Here’s some more.

 

In Alaska, Palin is challenging the dominant, sometimes corrupting, role of oil companies in the state’s political culture. “The public has put a lot of faith in us,” says Palin during a meeting with lawmakers in her downtown Anchorage office, where—as if to drive the point home—the giant letters on the side of the ConocoPhillips skyscraper fill an entire wall of windows. “They’re saying, ‘Here’s your shot, clean it up’.” For Palin, that has meant tackling the cozy relationship between the state’s political elite and the energy industry that provides 85 percent of Alaska’s tax revenues—and distancing herself from fellow Republicans, including the state’s senior U.S. senator, Ted Stevens, whose home was recently searched by FBI agents looking for evidence in an ongoing corruption investigation. (Stevens has denied any wrongdoing.) But even as she tackles Big Oil’s power, Palin has transformed her own family’s connections to the industry into a political advantage. Her husband, Todd, is a longtime employee of BP, but, as Palin points out, the “First Dude” is a blue-collar “sloper,” a fieldworker on the North Slope, a cherished occupation in the state. “He’s not in London making the decisions whether to build a gas line.”

In an interview with NEWSWEEK, Palin said it’s time for Alaska to “grow up” and end its reliance on pork-barrel spending. Shortly after taking office, Palin canceled funding for the “Bridge to Nowhere,” a $330 million project that Stevens helped champion in Congress. The bridge, which would have linked the town of Ketchikan to an island airport, had come to symbolize Alaska’s dependence on federal handouts. Rather than relying on such largesse, says Palin, she wants to prove Alaska can pay its own way, developing its huge energy wealth in ways that are “politically and environmentally clean.”

They are still being positive about her. And the democrats even had positive things to say about her in Alaska.

 

Although she has been in office less than a year, Palin, too, earns high marks from lawmakers on the other side of the aisle. During a debate earlier this year over a natural-gas bill, State Senate Minority Leader Beth Kerttula was astounded when she and another Democrat went to see the new governor to lay out their objections. “Not only did we get right in to see her,” says Kerttula, “but she asked us back twice—we saw her three times in 10 hours, until we came up with a solution.” Next week in Juneau, Alaska lawmakers will meet to overhaul the state’s system for taxing oil companies—a task Palin says was tainted last year by an oil-industry lobbyist who pleaded guilty to bribing lawmakers. Kerttula doesn’t expect to agree with the freshman governor on every step of the complex undertaking. But the minority leader looks forward to exploiting one backroom advantage she’s long waited for. “I finally get to go to the restroom and talk business with the governor,” she says. “The guys have been doing this for centuries.” And who says that’s not progress?

Now how are they covering her? Here’s a little list of the stories they have about her now: The Man Who’s Prepping Palin (she needs a man to tell her what’s what on foreign policy), Hurricane Sarah (miming a left-wing talking point to attack her), a link to lefty Crooks and Liars which appears as a Newsweek story, another blog appearing as a story about how she’s as boring (sorry, ordinary) as any other woman in the country, another blog about how the pick of Mrs. Palin was to please the theocratic wing of the republican party, and yet another blog appearing as a story about how Mrs. Palin is just this handled fake now.

What accounts for this change? Well, there is this discomforting fact that most of these stories are just lefty blogs appearing as Newsweek stories but there’s something else. She’s a conservative woman who might become president some day. This would be a fatal blow to their lefty sensibilities. They don’t want women to achieve great things, they want liberal women to achieve great things. Mrs. Palin is achieving great things and will continue to do great things even if some liberals can’t stand it. In fact, the doubters probably give her the drive to achieve more.

Ex-POWs say McCain experience clear

Filed under: Elections — admin @ 9:46 am

In a further repudiation of the “Songbird” smear of John McCain, in which he is accused of collaborating with the communist Viet Cong while their prisoner, there are 24 ex-POWs who are at the Republican Convention to support their brother.

There are 24 of them here, the men who went through hell with John McCain in Vietnamese prison camps four decades ago.

A few are politicking and organizing, but most are here simply to support the man they say represents a choice for America between honor and image.

“There is a waning sense of honor and duty … and that is troubling. And this election may be all about that very thing,” said Orson Swindle, who was a cellmate with Mr. McCain for two years in the infamous “Hanoi Hilton” prison camp.

BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




Have the Government Bail Out New Orleans and Fannie and Freddie and…

Filed under: Economics — admin @ 9:33 am

There’s a reason why I believe in economic freedom; free markets and free people. Read here and then I’ll tell you why.

New Orleans is still far from being able to withstand a 100-year storm — in other words, a storm that has a 1% chance of happening next year, a 10% chance in any given decade, and a 30% chance during the duration of a standard mortgage. An individual might accept these odds, but not a rational insurance company for any price most property owners would be willing to pay. Thus the city couldn’t have found a better time to rehearse its vulnerability — in the heat of a presidential campaign. For if the present New Orleans is to remain viable, it will be because federal money makes it so.

Just add it to the list. Final liability for more and more of life’s risks is being assumed by the federal government, i.e., taxpayers. Investment banks and hedge funds now aspire to be “too big to fail.” Washington has completed its monopolization of the mortgage business and the student loan business. Car companies in a financial bind? Congress is ready to become their lender of last resort too.

New Orleans is just one city. Miami, Houston and Long Island are all a typhoon away from losses greater than Katrina’s $140 billion. One-third of Katrina’s damages were covered by private insurance. In the event of a Hayward Fault earthquake of 7 or higher, San Francisco and vicinity would be thwacked with losses upwards of $165 billion — of which only 10% are insured. Guess who will pick up the tab? And why not. Perversely, all such commitments seem a drop in the bucket compared to $85 trillion in unfunded Medicare liability.

No matter what, there are costs. Sometimes it doesn’t make sense to build a city in a certain area. Sometimes it doesn’t make sense to create a new financial instrument. But how are we suppose to know?

By failure. Capitalism’s sledgehammer destroys bad decisions quickly and mercilessly. And we need that because continuing to waste good resources on bad decisions is a recipe for economic disaster. The quicker we find out that we made a bad move (building a home in a notorious hurricane path or handing out loans without any background check and then repackaging said loans to make them look like top rated debt) the quicker we can fix things.

But that wouldn’t be “fair” or “compassionate.” Actually, in my opinion, bailing people out is the meanest thing you can do to them. All you are doing is setting them up for continued failure. That’s what our activist and progressive federal government has done with the big banks and that is what it does with cities struck by a natural disaster. Eventually this golden goose of compassionate idiocy will end because our benighted federal government won’t have the money to let people continue to make bad decisions.

BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




Next Page »

Powered by WordPress