ConservativeINC

December 19, 2007

BigT’s Roundup - Mohammed, Tancredo, Spears, al Qaeda, and MORE!

Filed under: Immigration, Culture, Economics, War, Elections, Roundupalooza — admin @ 10:42 pm

Guess what the second most popular name in England is? Nope, it’s not Jeeves, it’s Mohammed. And yes, this does signal the end of civilization as we know it. Europe is being invaded by a people whose culture is antithetical to everything they stand for. But as long as the news stories coming out of Europe are about cute and cuddly things like baby boy’s names and not about radical mosques warping the minds of Europe’s immigrant youth there will be no response from Europe’s politicians. Eventually those boys named Mohammed will become politicians named Mohammed and they will be the ones setting policy. Maybe now that Tom Tancredo has abandoned his presidential run in America he could turn his ire towards Europe’s immigration problem for a while.

Oops, another Spears girl did it again. Britney’s younger sister, 16-year-old Jamie Lynn, got impregnated by her 18-year-old boyfriend. The media wants to make this out as some sort of rallying cry to legalize teenage intercourse. But what I find the most sad about this story and every other story about a Disney kid’s fall from grace is the feeding frenzy it creates in the media. Once you decide, as a parent, to make your kid a “star” the kid’s life is basically null and void. They are controlled by everyone around them and manipulated by the media. When they screw up they become the poster child for whatever their screw up was. Focusing on this type of story, though, distracts everyone from important things… like the efficacy of sex ed classes and black holes.

Britney and Jamie Lynn Spears.

In order to not disappoint you, I happen to have stories for both. First, sex ed. A story out today by ABC tells us how sex ed programs help delay sexual activity and leads to safer sex practices (at least on their first sexual encounter). But, as is expected from the MSM, they devote a good portion of the story to making sure the reader understands that abstinence only sex ed is really dangerous and the best option is “comprehensive” sex ed. Even though they did a poor job in hiding their biases here, ABC did point out that this study contradicts previous studies and may not be all that useful.

Earlier studies conducted in the 1970s through 1990s, however, seemed to suggest that sex education had little or no effect on the likelihood of young people engaging in sexual intercourse.

Until this report, there had been no recent national studies conducted to assess the effect of sex education on the sexual behaviors of youth — a situation that health experts say begs for further research to evaluate the most effective content and implementation of sex education.

Wow, this is shocking. A study that contradicts a bunch of previous studies. In America we let studies do our thinking for us. Instead of being logical about sex ed, for example, we put all of our trust into a bunch of studies we haven’t read and in all likelihood are faulty and/or misleading. It makes complete sense to me that sex ed just doesn’t work. It can’t. What do you think happens when you get a bunch of hormonal teenagers in a room together learning about the thing they aren’t suppose to be doing? If you didn’t know what happens, I’ll tell you. They go and get their abstinence wristbands and then head straight for the football bleachers and get it on with that cutie from math class.

Parents need to raise their children. If parents continue to hand over their children’s upbringing to largely unaccountable parties that is when you get pregnant teens. Look at Spears. Her mom probably hasn’t been around her for more than a few hours at a time for a bunch of years now. Is it really all that surprising when a starlet goes down the wrong path? Why should it be surprising when your teen, who you only see a couple hours a day because you work and because you believe they should be having “fun”, why is it surprising when they come home with a hangover, a drug habit, or with baby? If limiting the number of teen pregnancies is important to you why don’t you make sure your kid does the right thing.

Now onto black holes. How does this make you feel?

If a jet were to hit Earth, Evans said, it would destroy the ozone layer and collapse the magnetosphere that blankets the planet and protects it from harmful solar particles. Without the ozone layer and magnetosphere, he said, much of life on Earth would end.

Scary stuff. Luckily, however, that’s billions of years off and by then the world will be a shriveled mass thanks to global warming. Basically, what is going on is an intergalactic mugging. One black hole has sent out a burst of cosmic radiation and it is crashing into another galaxy. Unfortunately for the little green men who inhabit that galaxy, they are now probably all dead. Here’s the picture of this horrible event.

Black hole mugging

In other black hole news, the black hole known as liberalism has scored a big win today. The Federal Reserve has decided to enact lending regulations in an abrupt about face to its previous stance. I guess the relentless onslaught from the moron branch of economics, the branch that says whenever something goes wrong it can be fixed by legislation, won out in the end.

A while ago I wrote a piece called Capitalism’s Sledgehammer that dealt specifically with this branch of economics. Failure, like the failure of the subprime mortgage market, is one of the things capitalism is really good with. If you’ve been doing something wrong then capitalism will tell you with a loss in profits. But if you bring the government in to “protect” you and make things “better” you will get a bastardized form of capitalism that has a hard time telling you something is wrong. Furthermore, government regulations prevent people from taking risks, which puts a restrictor plate on our economy’s engine. In the end we give away our economy’s upside for a false sense of protection.

And what about our economy, is it dying? Well, Morgan Stanley posts a loss for the first time in its 72-year history. But Oracle’s profit soared and NetSuite’s IPO did better than expected. Personally, my portfolio has been hit quite hard but during the third quarter our GDP went up over 4%, so it would seem that there is still some steam left in our economy’s engine. Let me put it this way, I would never bet against American ingenuity.

BigT’s Linkapalooza:
TO wants to KO Jessica Simpson.

Jessica Simpson and her boots
[Had to include the picture]

Al Qaeda still a threat in Iraq, duh.
“Don’t Tase Me, Bro” is most memorable.
Magna Carta worth a lot of money.
Hillary has a lot to hide.
BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




Where Does Our Oil Come From?

Filed under: Economics — admin @ 3:40 pm

Short answer: a lot of places.

The Financial Times has an interesting chart that shows who produces oil, who uses it, and who ships to whom.

Since we are Americans we’ll focus on America. According to this chart we consume 20,589,000 barrels a day, which is 24.1% of the world’s total consumption. We produce 6,871,000 barrels a day, which is 8% of the world’s total production. We have proven reserves of 29,900 barrels a day, which is 2.5% of the world’s total. We can refine 17,455,000 barrels a day, which represents 20% of the world’s total refinery capacity.

OIL

Of those 20,589,000 barrels a day we use we get 2,708,000 barrels (13.15% of our total consumption) from South and Central America, 2,302,000 barrels (11.18%) from Canada, 2,276,000 barrels (11.05%) from the Middle East, 1,917,000 barrels (9.31%) from West Africa, 1,700,000 barrels (8.26%) from Mexico, and 2,709,000 barrels (13.16%) from the rest of the world. That means we import 13,612,000 barrels (66.11%) everyday.

Of the 6,871,000 barrels a day we produce we export 371,000 barrels (5.4% of our total production) to South and Central America, 313,000 barrels (4.56%) to Europe, 255,000 barrels (3.71%) to Mexico, 154,000 barrels (3.71%) to Canada, 88,000 barrels (1.28%) to Japan, and 134,000 barrels (1.95%) to the rest of the world. Of our total production we export 1,315,000 barrels (19.14%) everyday.

These numbers aren’t exact (if you add the imports together with the production it is less than total consumption) but they’re pretty close. BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




December 17, 2007

Socialism Wrapped in Silk in Venezuela

Filed under: Statism, Economics — admin @ 5:02 pm

This is a priceless video from You Tube. It has Venezuela’s Interior Minister Pedro Carreno talking to reporters about the greatness of socialism. But then the clouds parted and the sun shown down on this man and his Gucci and Louis Vuitton clothing. A reporter asked him whether or not he was being hypocritical by bashing capitalism while wearing the fruits of its labor.

According to Reuters he said: “I don’t, uh … I … of course,” stammered Carreno on Tuesday before regaining his composure. “It’s not contradictory because I would like Venezuela to produce all this so I could buy stuff produced here instead of 95 percent of what we consume being imported.”

Here’s the whole story:

CARACAS (Reuters) - A video of a Gucci- and Louis Vuitton-clad politician attacking capitalism then struggling to explain how his luxurious clothes square with his socialist beliefs has become an instant YouTube hit in Venezuela.

Venezuelan Interior Minister Pedro Carreno was momentarily at a loss for words when a journalist interrupted his speech and asked if it was not contradictory to criticize capitalism while wearing Gucci shoes and a tie made by Parisian luxury goods maker Louis Vuitton.

“I don’t, uh … I … of course,” stammered Carreno on Tuesday before regaining his composure. “It’s not contradictory because I would like Venezuela to produce all this so I could buy stuff produced here instead of 95 percent of what we consume being imported.”

The video clip (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDsdXkY4UlE) had been viewed more than 15,000 times on Thursday, a day after it was posted on the YouTube Web site.

Despite the best efforts of left-wing President Hugo Chavez to instill austere socialist values in its people, the oil-rich South American nation remains attached to consumerism.

Riding a boom in oil prices, middle-class and wealthy Venezuelans are on a spending spree, guzzling fine whiskies and snapping up luxury cars. Poorer Venezuelans also have benefited, with subsidies driving a spike in demand for basic products.

BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress