ConservativeINC

June 25, 2008

What About the Inequity in Power?

Filed under: Culture, Economics — admin @ 11:09 am

You know what, I never thought about inequity in such specific terms before I read an article by Cato’s Arnold Kling reprinted from the Orange County Register (Click here for whole article). Here’s a little excerpt:

I want to focus on American excess in terms of political power. As unseemly as it is for America’s wealthiest people to strive for more money, America’s political class is far worse. They have a ridiculous excess of power, and yet they only want more.

Montgomery County, Md., has an annual budget of $3.8 billion. This sum is under the control of a County Council with nine members. On an average per-politician basis, each County Council member controls just over $400 million a year in spending.

To put an annual spending figure of $400 million in perspective, consider this: if you had $8 billion in assets and earned 5 percent per year on those assets, that would give you $400 million in annual income. And few Americans have that much. The world’s wealthiest person is Warren Buffett, with $62 billion (admittedly he has often been able to earn more than 5 percent per year from investments). Bill Gates has $58 billion. Fewer than 40 Americans have more than $8 billion in assets, and their names are largely familiar to us – the Waltons of Wal-Mart, Sergie Brin and Larry Page of Google, and so on.

Can you name the members of the County Council in Montgomery County, Md.? I can’t name very many of them, and I live there. Still, getting elected to the County Council in Montgomery County, which is pretty far down the ladder in terms of political power in the United States, enables you to control more annual spending than the wealth of Donald Trump or Steve Jobs.

(Editor’s note: Orange County has a budget of roughly $6 billion, overseen by five county supervisors – or $1.2 billion in spending per supervisor. Los Angeles County’s 2007-08 budget is about $21 billion, overseen by five supervisors – or more than $4 billion per supervisor.)

At the federal level, the budget is $3 trillion. If you divide that by 535 (the number of senators and representatives), then, on average, each legislator controls over $5 billion in spending per year. That is more than even the world’s richest person could spend annually.

Isn’t this just rich? We have hundreds of liberal and some “conservative” politicians decrying the inequities of our capitalistic system. They deride the rich for having more power than the rest of us but the truth elegantly exposes this insidious misdirection.

Yes, the rich do have more power than the average person but politicians, even small-fries from Montgomery County, have more power than all but the richest people in the world. IN THE WORLD!

You know what - I don’t think Mr. Kling goes quite far enough with this specific comparison. He’s right, politicians do control a lot of money. And I’ll even accept the fact that they control all the money that they spend.

But what about the high-level bureaucrat? Or the legislative aide? These people, by virtue of their being liked by an elected official, also have power over a substantial parts of the budget. We don’t just have 535 power brokers in Washington, we have tens of thousands of power brokers.

How is our government all that different than feudalism? We have an aristocracy with differing levels of power. There are kings and queens and counts and lords. And, of course, we are the serfs. Even people like Warren Buffett are serfs. Yeah, higher level serfs, but when you break it down they probably spend a heck of a lot less money every year than even lowly county council members do.

As of yet we have completely ignored the biggest source of power for governmental officials. The power to dictate how we live our lives. Again from Mr. Kling:

The monetary comparisons only scratch the surface of the inequality and excesses of political power in the United States. Bill Gates might be said to control as much money as a member of the County Council where I live. But he does not have the power to, say, tell the people of the county where they can and cannot smoke, or to tell local businesses what wages they must pay their workers, or to decide whether a local concert venue will be devoted to folk music or to rock.

Wealthy people do not control the curriculum in our children’s schools. Politicians do. Wealthy people do not set licensing requirements for everything from doctors to interior designers to hair stylists to manicurists. Politicians do.

Can the Waltons force you to shop at their store? No, but Councilman Nobody can force them out of their little fiefdom. Can Bill Gates force you to use Vista? No, but federal prosecutors can sue him for making too much money in their opinion.

Our local boils on our asses can decree where we smoke, drink, speak, what we can drive, how we live our lives. Somebody who got 5,000 votes has a much bigger affect on our lives than someone who has to make 50,000,000 customers happy.

The next time your lefty buddy starts to cry about the extreme gap in earnings between the wealthiest and the poor you need to retort back with the exponentially greater gap between the power of politicians and the average guy. BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




June 24, 2008

MS-13 on the Run?

Filed under: Immigration, War — admin @ 6:23 pm

I seriously doubt it. Taking a couple of thugs out of action is a good thing but won’t destroy the gang. Taking away their reason for being an organization - i.e. their ability to make money - will kill MS-13 and every other gang. How do you do that? Hell, I don’t know.

A federal grand jury in Charlotte has indicted 26 reputed members of an international gang accused in a cross-border drug ring.

One of the men was previously charged with killing two people in a Greensboro restaurant. Greensboro police also helped arrest another man named in the indictment.

Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey unsealed the federal indictment Tuesday that charges members of the MS-13 gang with federal racketeering for forming a drug trafficking ring that sold cocaine, marijuana and narcotics, and of committing multiple robberies. Three of the men indicted face charges for four murders in Greensboro and Charlotte.

Federal authorities said MS-13 is one of the largest gangs in the nation with 10,000 members in the U.S., Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala. Investigators said one of the gang’s leaders is imprisoned in El Salvador.

The indictment says gang members hold regular meetings much like a government, discussing gang rules, problems and unity. The cliques met frequently in Charlotte, Greensboro, Durham and Columbia, S.C. and elsewhere, and the meetings often brought in gang guests from other states, according to court documents.

Criminal activity, especially directed at rival gangs, increased a member’s position in the gang, according to the indictment.

Many of the leaders — often called “shot callers” or “voices” — are in prison in El Salvador, the indictment said. But prosecutors claim gang members paid dues at their meetings and often sent cash to those in prison, at times wiring money at the request of a leader.

Source: news-record.com

And were these guys here legally? Evidently most were not. Surprising. I thought they were here doing jobs Americans won’t do. Well, I guess murder and narcotics distribution would be a couple of jobs Americans won’t do.

“Criminal gangs such as MS-13 increasingly recognize no borders, which means that international cooperation is more important today than it ever was before,” Mukasey said, thanking the government of El Salvador for its role in the bust.

“Thankfully, that collaboration is on full display in our relationship with the government of El Salvador,” he said.

MS-13 is an extremely violent gang that originated in El Salvador and operates there and in Honduras, Guatemala, Mexico and throughout the United States, Mukasey said.

“Today’s indictment is merely the latest sign of the gang’s reach, and it shows the breadth and seriousness of the crimes that MS-13 members are alleged to have committed,” he said.

Many of the defendants were in the United States illegally, and two were additionally charged with re-entering the country unlawfully after having been deported, the DOJ statement said.

Source: Breitbart

Wonderful people. Even though these raids won’t completely kill off these types of organizations it will put them on the defense a little bit. BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




Israeli/Palestinian Truce Shaken by Rocket Fire

Filed under: War, Wolves in Sheeps Clothing — admin @ 6:04 pm

I was wondering if anyone knew how many truces have been broken in this region? Could this have been nothing more than a military tactic? Um, duh.

Palestinian militants fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel on Tuesday, threatening to unravel a cease-fire days after it began, and Israel responded by closing vital border crossings into Gaza.

Despite what it called a “gross violation” of the truce, Israel refrained from military action and said it would send an envoy soon to Egypt to work on the next stage of a broader cease-fire agreement: a prisoner swap that would bring home an Israeli soldier held by Hamas for more than two years.

Hamas, the militant Islamic group that rules Gaza, promised to rein in the Iran- and Syria-backed faction that carried out the rocket attacks and pledged to remain committed to the truce that went into effect June 19 and urged restraint by all sides.

The fact that the cease-fire held up despite the severe strain was an indication that both sides had a lot at stake in the negotiations for a broader agreement. Hamas wants to show it can break the Israeli blockade and provide much-needed relief to Gaza’s beleaguered residents, while Israel wants to stop the daily rocket fire that has disrupted the lives of thousands of its citizens.

The midafternoon barrage, which slightly wounded two people, capped a day of violence that presented the truce with its first serious test. Just before midnight, Palestinian militants fired a mortar shell into an empty area in southern Israel. And in a pre-dawn raid, Israeli troops killed two Palestinians, one of them an Islamic Jihad area commander, in the West Bank city of Nablus.

Islamic Jihad, a militant group backed by Syria and Iran, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire from Gaza. Although the West Bank is not included in the truce agreement, the group said the rockets were retaliation for the Nablus raid.

BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress