ConservativeINC

November 23, 2007

Sterilization: Their Last Hope

Filed under: Watermelon — admin @ 6:48 pm

She got sterilized to save the world from Climate Change.

She won’t be having any kids!

Obviously it’s not because she’s too ugly, especially considering the fact that she’s British. She’s not having any kids because she had herself sterilized to save the environment. Yeah!

Here’s what the eco-hero has to say:

“Having children is selfish. It’s all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet,” says Toni, 35.

“Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population.”

She also had an abortion for the same reason. This woman has proven that she will do whatever she can to save the planet from us. And, as the story points out, her husband is not only OK with this but he is ecstatic (shocking).

But I’m not sold on this yet. I don’t think she really gives an aborted fetus about what she’s doing. She even said this cutting her own argument out from under her legs:

“I’ve never doubted that I made the right decision. Ed and I married in September 2002, and have a much nicer lifestyle as a result of not having children.

“We love walking and hiking, and we often go away for weekends.

“Every year, we also take a nice holiday - we’ve just come back from South Africa.

“We feel we can have one long-haul flight a year, as we are vegan and childless, thereby greatly reducing our carbon footprint and combating over-population.”

Instead of having a kid that might someday find a cure for the world’s problems (people according to this woman) she’s having a long haul flight to South Africa. Somebody needs to tell this woman about carbon offsets because then she could go on as many trips as she wanted!

Even with the smell of hypocrisy in the air I still think this is a wonderful idea.

If every watermelon, um, environmentalist crusader, decided to get sterilized they would die out in a generation or two. Think I’m overstating this? Just take a look at Mark Steyn’s America Alone and you’ll know what I’m talking about.

Whole countries are slowly trudging towards irrelevancy because they aren’t reproducing enough to sustain themselves. Environmentalism isn’t even a country, it’s a movement. So you can just imagine how quickly they would lose steam if more and more of these people decided to go the sterilization route.

You can couple this with the fact that most of the watermelon people I know already don’t have that many kids and you have yourself a movement that can throw a party but no one can come because there is no one at home to get the invites.

“But what about converts?” some of you are thinking. Yes, there will always be converts to any movement. Just look at the Shakers, that hapless religious cult that prohibited having sex at all, they weren’t getting any increase in membership through the midwives. But they were small and they died out after a while.

The total disappearance of environmentalism probably won’t be happening anytime soon. However, without the biggest zealots reproducing much if at all the movement will lose steam and direction.

Look at environmentalism today. It’s already being hijacked by corporations who are using it to generate more revenue and/or to score some of that pork from Congress. No one expects the next president, even a democrat, to wholly embrace Kyoto or Kyoto-like restrictions. They’re now content browbeating people into buying carbon credits or just planting a tree.

Watermelons don’t reproduce that much already and some of them are “fixing” their reproductive organs before they can do the world any “harm.” Paradoxically, the only way they can save the world is if they don’t exist. Here’s to green sterilizations! BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




Someone Hit an Iceberg in the Antarctic?

Filed under: Satire - If Only, Watermelon — admin @ 12:50 pm

someone hit an iceburg in the Antarctic?

I thought there were no icebergs left? How could they have hit… ice? This is insane.

Obviously the Bush Administration worked overtime on “Thanks”giving Day (more like a day of mourning for me) to combine all the ice in the West Wing to create this iceberg. What, you don’t believe me?

Every Thanksgiving the president does something big like going to Iraq to lift the spirits of the soldiers fighting an ILLEGAL war against peaceful people. Since those clandestine visits to the scene of the crime don’t correspond enough with a bump in his approval ratings he decided to do something different this Thanksgiving. He and the rest of his staff (not Cheney, the DEVIL would melt the ice) got buckets and buckets of ice and put them together in ten big dump trucks.

Then they took the dump trucks down to Annapolis and filled up the CIA’s Top Secret Ice Machine 100, a nuclear sub retrofitted to haul ice to the Arctic and Antarctica. This sub made record time down to Antarctica’s waters and got into position to sink this ship.

When the ship got in range, in almost perfectly clear waters as you can see by the picture above, it opened up its backside and let the large iceberg go. It was shot right at the boat like a dart and poked a hole in the cruiseliner.

There it is, you heard it here first. The CIA, with some help from our Commander Liar in Chief, obviously sunk this boat. Do you need any more proof?

Fine, here’s the last bit of proof you need. It is a Canadian owned boat flying the Liberian flag. This racist regime that has hijacked the White House can’t stand it that the Canadians would allow some dark-skinned people from Africa fly their flag over what “should” be a white man’s boat. Bush and his cronies need to be impeached IMMEDIATELY!

They obviously did this little stunt to show the world that global warming climate change is a “myth.” I don’t look at the neocon blogs but I’m sure they’re abuzz right now saying that this is a sign sent from “God” himself that “global warming” isn’t happening. The little neocon rats, still groggy from yesterday’s rape of the animal world in celebration of their racist raping of the Native Americans, are furiously typing with their chubby fingers telling their mind numbed morons that “global warming” isn’t a threat.

But you know the truth. Bush and his neo-SS deliberately sunk this boat with an “iceberg” to “prove” to the mindless masses that there is nothing to fear from climate change. Their message is to go on and shop like there is no tomorrow, belch millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere to go to your materialistic malls, and cut another 1,000 years off the world’s life. They make me SICK!

Now you know the truth, go out and spread it.

This bit of satire brought to you by a still-groggy “neocon” with his chubby fingers. BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




November 20, 2007

The Consensus’ Fallibility - The UN was wrong about HIV and Science was wrong about Stem Cells

Filed under: Wolves in Sheeps Clothing, Watermelon — admin @ 6:39 pm

Why couldn’t they be wrong about global warming as well?

Embryonic stem cells were going to turn out to be a panacea just a mere three years ago. That was when John Edwards, the man who made his money off of channeling dead fetuses as a trial lawyer, told the American people that if he and John Kerry were elected to the White House people like Christopher Reeve would get up out of that chair and walk again. They would walk again.

The point that the shady VP candidate and current presidential candidate was trying to make was that embryonic stem cells can be made into any other type of human cell that they want. Embryonic stem cells are basically clean slates where doctors and researchers can figure out cures for humanity’s worse diseases. Like Mr Edwards said, it can make the paralyzed walk again.

One catch though. Embryonic stem cells come from embryos and those embryos need to die for this research to go on. Killing hundreds of the unborn to possibly find the cure for a myriad of other diseases that could save untold millions in the future is the essence of an ethical dilemma. Personally, there’s no way I would allow this type of research to go on because it does require the death of the unborn, which I’m morally against. It is a tough call and, thankfully, that tough call is possibly being made a heck of a lot easier.

According to Forbes, researchers have figured out how to make skin cells act like embryonic stem cells. There still needs to be a lot of work done to see if this could ever be feasible but this is promising nonetheless. Still, even if turning skin cells into embryonic-like stem cells works there is absolutely no certainty that this will lead to a plethora of cures whereas adult stem cells have already been used effectively.

Science was wrong about embryonic stem cells being the only option. Granted, this is an extremely complex issue and to understand for myself what all goes into this would probably take up most of my lifetime. But science got it wrong. A much easier task, like accurately measuring the number of HIV affected people, can’t be screwed up so easily. Could it?

Well, if you’re the UN then anything is possible - well any screw up is possible that is.

They overstated the number of people living with HIV by 20%
. Instead of 39.5 million with the horrific virus it is probably more likely 33.2 million. Still horrible, but significantly less so. (I seem to remember that they also significantly overstated population levels in their previous studies as well but since I can’t find that story anymore we’ll just forget I wrote this sentence.)

Figuring out the number of people living infected with HIV is no small feat but it seems imminently manageable for the global organization that is tasked to come up with numbers like that.

But the UN got it wrong. Science got it wrong with stem cells. Both consensus viewpoints are now standing on shaky ground. Shouldn’t we also be worried about other consensus opinions?

I think so.

Take global warming, for example. It is significantly more complex then embryonic stem cells and requires the gathering of significantly more data then required to find out how many people infected with HIV there are. But everyone, at least the “smart people,” think that this time there is no room for challenges to the theory of man made climate change.

Science regularly gets it wrong. That’s no knock on scientists but their job seems to be get it wrong 999 times to get it right once. A million different things could have gone wrong with the studies, with the models, with the gathering of data, with anything really. What if they were gathering the wrong data?

And we’re suppose to radically change our economy so that we can maybe change something we really don’t know all that much about? At least when our ancestors sacrificed a cow to the gods to make their crops succeed they weren’t committing economic suicide. We’re being asked to sacrifice every cow because they fart too much.

It is human nature to get things wrong. There’s no shame in that. There is shame in being fooled every time by the same people over and over again. Stop being fooled, question the consensus and look into the data for yourself. Read books by people who don’t believe global warming is happening. Find out all the information you can. Because if we don’t question the consensus now we’re going to seriously pay for it later. BigT

Tell Your Friends! Bookmark Me!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Take Me To Your Homepage!

AddThis Feed Button




« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress